NASA Internal Document Reveals Elitist Plan to Destroy Mankind

Click image to zoom

UFO Footage of Strange Craft Over House in Colorado ~ November 28th, 2013

Click image to zoom

Do You Approve or Disapprove of Obama's Job Performance?

Follow this link to vote whether you approve or disapprove of President Obama's job performance.

Make your say count!

Why Women Aren’t Crazy ~ What is Gaslighting?

Are you being manipulated?
byYashar Ali

You’re so sensitive. You’re so emotional. You’re defensive. You’re overreacting. Calm down. Relax. Stop freaking out! You’re crazy! I was just joking, don’t you have a sense of humor? You’re so dramatic. Just get over it already!
Sound familiar?
If you’re a woman, it probably does.
Do you ever hear any of these comments from your spouse, partner, boss, friends, colleagues, or relatives after you have expressed frustration, sadness, or anger about something they have done or said?
When someone says these things to you, it’s not an example of inconsiderate behavior. When your spouse shows up half an hour late to dinner without calling—that’s inconsiderate behavior. A remark intended to shut you down like, “Calm down, you’re overreacting,” after you just addressed someone else’s bad behavior, is emotional manipulation—pure and simple.
And this is the sort of emotional manipulation that feeds an epidemic in our country, an epidemic that defines women as crazy, irrational, overly sensitive, unhinged. This epidemic helps fuel the idea that women need only the slightest provocation to unleash their (crazy) emotions. It’s patently false and unfair.
I think it’s time to separate inconsiderate behavior from emotional manipulation and we need to use a word not in our normal vocabulary.
I want to introduce a helpful term to identify these reactions: gaslighting.
Gaslighting is a term, often used by mental health professionals (I am not one), to describe manipulative behavior used to confuse people into thinking their reactions are so far off base that they’re crazy.
The term comes from the 1944 MGM film, Gaslight, starring Ingrid Bergman. Bergman’s husband in the film, played by Charles Boyer, wants to get his hands on her jewelry. He realizes he can accomplish this by having her certified as insane and hauled off to a mental institution. To pull of this task, he intentionally sets the gaslights in their home to flicker off and on, and every time Bergman’s character reacts to it, he tells her she’s just seeing things. In this setting, a gaslighter is someone who presents false information to alter the victim’s perception of him or herself.
Today, when the term is referenced, it’s usually because the perpetrator says things like, “You’re so stupid” or “No one will ever want you” to the victim. This is an intentional, pre-meditated form of gaslighting, much like the actions of Charles Boyer’s character in Gaslight, where he strategically plots to confuse Ingrid Bergman’s character into believing herself unhinged.
The form of gaslighting I’m addressing is not always pre-mediated or intentional, which makes it worse, because it means all of us, especially women, have dealt with it at one time or another.
Those who engage in gaslighting create a reaction—whether it’s anger, frustration, sadness—in the person they are dealing with. Then, when that person reacts, the gaslighter makes them feel uncomfortable and insecure by behaving as if their feelings aren’t rational or normal.
My friend Anna (all names changed to protect privacy) is married to a man who feels it necessary to make random and unprompted comments about her weight. Whenever she gets upset or frustrated with his insensitive comments, he responds in the same, defeating way, “You’re so sensitive. I’m just joking.”
My friend Abbie works for a man who finds a way, almost daily, to unnecessarily shoot her down and her work product. Comments like, “Can’t you do something right?” or “Why did I hire you?” are regular occurrences for her. Her boss has no problem firing people (he does it regularly), so you wouldn’t know that based on these comments, Abbie has worked for him for six years. But every time she stands up for herself and says “It doesn’t help me when you say these things,” she gets the same reaction: “Relax; you’re overreacting.”
 It’s a whole lot easier to emotionally manipulate someone who has been conditioned by our society to accept it. We continue to burden women because they don’t refuse our burdens as easily. It’s the ultimate cowardice. Abbie thinks her boss is just being a jerk in these moments, but the truth is, he is making those comments to manipulate her into thinking her reactions are out of whack. And it’s exactly that kind manipulation that has left her feeling guilty about being sensitive, and as a result, she has not left her job.
But gaslighting can be as simple as someone smiling and saying something like, “You’re so sensitive,” to somebody else. Such a comment may seem innocuous enough, but in that moment, that person is making a judgment about how someone else should feel.
While dealing with gaslighting isn’t a universal truth for women, we all certainly know plenty of women who encounter it at work, home, or in personal relationships.
And the act of gaslighting does not simply affect women who are not quite sure of themselves. Even vocal, confident, assertive women are vulnerable to gaslighting.
Because women bare the brunt of our neurosis. It is much easier for us to place our emotional burdens on the shoulders of our wives, our female friends, our girlfriends, our female employees, our female colleagues, than for us to impose them on the shoulders of men.
It’s a whole lot easier to emotionally manipulate someone who has been conditioned by our society to accept it. We continue to burden women because they don’t refuse our burdens as easily. It’s the ultimate cowardice.
Whether gaslighting is conscious or not, it produces the same result: it renders some women emotionally mute.
These women aren’t able to clearly express to their spouses that what is said or done to them is hurtful. They can’t tell their boss that his behavior is disrespectful and prevents them from doing their best work. They can’t tell their parents that, when they are being critical, they are doing more harm than good.
When these women receive any sort of push back to their reactions, they often brush it off by saying, “Forget it, it’s okay.”
That “forget it” isn’t just about dismissing a thought, it is about self-dismissal. It’s heartbreaking.
No wonder some women are unconsciously passive aggressive when expressing anger, sadness, or frustration. For years, they have been subjected to so much gaslighting that they can no longer express themselves in a way that feels authentic to them.
They say, “I’m sorry” before giving their opinion. In an email or text message, they place a smiley face next to a serious question or concern, thereby reducing the impact of having to express their true feelings.
You know how it looks: “You’re late :)
These are the same women who stay in relationships they don’t belong in, who don’t follow their dreams, who withdraw from the kind of life they want to live.

Since I have embarked on this feminist self-exploration in my life and in the lives of the women I know, this concept of women as “crazy” has really emerged as a major issue in society at large and an equally major frustration for the women in my life, in general.
From the way women are portrayed on reality shows, to how we condition boys and girls to see women, we have come to accept the idea that women are unbalanced, irrational individuals, especially in times of anger and frustration.
Just the other day, on a flight from San Francisco to Los Angeles, a flight attendant who had come to recognize me from my many trips asked me what I did for a living. When I told her that I write mainly about women, she immediately laughed and asked, “Oh, about how crazy we are?”
Her gut reaction to my work made me really depressed. While she made her response in jest, her question nonetheless makes visible a pattern of sexist commentary that travels through all facets of society on how men view women, which also greatly impacts how women may view themselves.
As far as I am concerned, the epidemic of gaslighting is part of the struggle against the obstacles of inequality that women constantly face. Acts of gaslighting steal their most powerful tool: their voice. This is something we do to women every day, in many different ways.
I don’t think this idea that women are “crazy,” is based in some sort of massive conspiracy. Rather, I believe it’s connected to the slow and steady drumbeat of women being undermined and dismissed, on a daily basis. And gaslighting is one of many reasons why we are dealing with this public construction of women as “crazy”
I recognize that I’ve been guilty of gaslighting my women friends in the past (but never my male friends—surprise, surprise). It’s shameful, but I’m glad I realized that I did it on occasion and put a stop to it.
While I take total responsibility for my actions, I do believe that I, along with many men, am a byproduct of our conditioning. It’s about the general insight our conditioning gives us into admitting fault and exposing any emotion.
When we are discouraged in our youth and early adulthood from expressing emotion, it causes many of us to remain steadfast in our refusal to express regret when we see someone in pain from our actions.
When I was writing this piece, I was reminded of one of my favorite Gloria Steinem quotes, “The first problem for all of us, men and women, is not to learn, but to unlearn.”
So for many of us, it’s first about unlearning how to flicker those gaslights and learning how to acknowledge and understand the feelings, opinions, and positions of the women in our lives.
But isn’t the issue of gaslighting ultimately about whether we are conditioned to believe that women’s opinions don’t hold as much weight as ours? That what women have to say, what they feel, isn’t quite as legitimate?

George Carlin: They're Coming for Your Social Security

Click image to zoom

Is Obama's Marriage Just an Act? Listen to what Wife Michelle Says

Click image to zoom

Strange UFOs Zip Just Over Houses ~ Albuquerque, New Mexico

Click image to zoom

Possible Reasons the Department of Homeland Security is Hoarding Ammo

By Donald Sensing

The federal agency’s primary concern is now centered around thwarting “homegrown terrorism,” but information produced and used by the DHS to train its personnel routinely equates conservative political ideology with domestic extremism. (In other words, the DHS is targeting conservative republicans by labeling them terrorists for their beliefs.)
A study funded by the Department of Homeland Security that was leaked last year characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists. 
In August 2012, the DHS censored information relating to the amount of bullets purchased by the federal agency on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, citing an “unusual and compelling urgency” to acquire the bullets, noting that there is a shortage of bullets which is threatening a situation that could cause “substantial safety issues for the government” should law enforcement officials not be adequately armed.

But we should not discount that for years the Left has promoted the idea of disarming Americans by controlling the availability of ammunition for civilians. 

On Jan. 2, DHS awarded a contract to 
...Evian Group Inc., an organization that was formed just five days before the announcement of the solicitation [in December]. 
As James Smith documents, Evian Group seems to be little more than a front organization and doesn’t appear to have any real business assets, a genuine physical address, a website, or even a phone number.
So not only is the DHS stockpiling decades of war's worth of ammunition - which means literally centuries of DHS usage - it's doing so through front companies that come into being to collect the contract checks and presumably disappear once the checks have been written. The real questions here are who owns or controls Evian Group and what is his/their connection to the Democrat party?

Again the question, Why is DHS buying all this ammo? Here are the answers I propose in order of my preference of accuracy:

1. To transfer enormous sums of money to politically-connected or -useful individuals. In other words, the massive purchases are just old fashioned, money laundering graft and corruption. It sure would be useful to know how much Evian was paid for the ammo, because my guess is that Evian's controllers are buying the ammo from manufacturers at discount, then marking it up at least 40 percent to sell it to DHS.

What ultimately happens to that 40 percent markup? It goes two places: the bank accounts of Evian's controllers get half and the other half is funneled through shell-corps, bogus non-profits and established foundations, finally to the Democrat National Committee and Democrat campaigns and causes.

2. To reduce the supply of ammunition available to ordinary Americans.

3. To shoot right-wing domestic "terrorists," although honestly the purchases so far exceed what might be remotely be needed for that even if these presumed terrorists ever, you know, actually started terrorizing, that I can't imagine this is much related to the reason for the purchases.

No, this is looting the public treasury, pure and simple, to keep the Democrat party in power.

Four Spaceships Soaring Through Deep Space? Novermber 11th, 2013

Click image to zoom

A Message of Love and Community ~ Teal Scott & Ralph Smart


Click image to zoom

Geneticist David Suzuki Speaks out Against Genetically Modified Crops

Where are all the Space-age Tech Toys? Google Glass is on its Way

Just don your Google Glass eye wear, soon to be offered in prescription lenses no less, and everything the internet has to offer and even more is right there at your fingertips, or should I say right there in front of your eye. A miniature monitor allows you to quickly take a snapshot, record to video a precious moment or even share what you are seeing live to friends, instantly learn the facts or history of what you see in front of you, find directions, translate a foreign language, check the time and approaching weather, send an email or instant message, its all possible and only awaits the command of your voice. Now that's some future tech, and its coming soon from  the sci-fi fans at Google.

The Google Glass internet monitor

Greg Giles 

Intriguing Footage of Gray ET Peering in Window

This is one of the most thoroughly examined pieces of extraterrestrial evidence. Taken by Stan Romanek, who contends he is a victim of alien abduction and author of several books detailing his abduction experiences, shows what appears to be a gray type extraterrestrial peering into a window of the Romanek household.

Click image to zoom

This article was aggregated under the Creative Commons License. If you feel this article has been re-published outside of these parameters, please contact us immediately at to resolve any issues. We respect copyrights and address any concerns promptly. Thank you.

Mothman ~ Original News Reports & Interviews with Witnesses

Photograph possibly depicting the mysterious Mothman perched high atop the Silver Bridge in West Virginia.

Click image to zoom

The Entire Fiat Money System is Bankrupt: Demise of the Global US Fiat Dollar Reserve Currency ~ by Matthias Chang

by Matthias Chang

Major issues or trends do not change on a daily or even monthly basis. A trend may take a few years to run its course and unless there is a major factor that may affect the trend, there is hardly any need to comment any further on the trend or outcomes.
The events unraveling post Bernanke’s decision not to taper QE is most significant because it confirms our analysis that the banking crisis has not been resolved in any significant way after five years of money printing and massive asset inflation. The fiat money system has but one outcome – total collapse. It will also mean the demise of the global US dollar reserve currency.
There are no solutions at hand.

Bernanke is totally discredited and his continued tenure as Chair of the FED would only accelerate the realisation that the FED and all central banks have failed. Hence, the need to change the “leadership” at the FED, but the same policies would be followed with some cosmetic changes to hoodwink the ignorant masses. It is analogous to the transition from the second Bush presidency to that of Obama and all the theatrics of “change” propaganda. In fact, Obama is Bush 2 on steroids! Yellen will be Bernanke on steroids. Why are we so certain of this outcome at Future Fast-Forward?
Our reasons are as follows:
Prior to the Global Financial Tsunami of 2008, I had written several articles exposing the global Too Big To Fail (TBTF) banks as financial rapists and predators and they would cause untold havoc to the financial system.
Post the crisis, I had also warned that these global TBTF banks are all insolvent and the toxic assets on their balance sheets would exceed US$20 trillion at the minimum. The entire fiat money system is bankrupt. Printing toilet paper money by the trillions does not make the system solvent. It is a clear admission that the system is totally broken.
The banking Humpty-Dumpty has fallen from the wall and shattered into a thousand pieces! The confirmation for this is the fact that all central banks led by the FED have only one aim – to create massive asset inflation. How can a stock market of a bankrupt nation be at an all-time high?
The FED and central banks the world over are not interested in resolving the unemployment problem because record unemployment would not collapse the fiat money system. It may trigger massive social unrest but that can be put down by a militarised police force, supported by a battle-hardened military as is happening in the US.
In the circumstances, we need to ask the US$ Trillion question – Why are all the central banks focusing on asset inflation via creation of money out of thin air?
It used to be that the Petro-dollar was the linchpin of the global economy. However, when the derivatives market took off and became a US$800 Trillion global casino, the US$ toilet paper became the currency in global financial trading and speculation.
All the TBTF banks were leveraged to their eyeballs and the collaterals were hypothecated and re-hypothecated so many times over, it became an inverted pyramid joke.
The collaterals were bundled up into CDOs etc. rated AAA by corrupt rating agencies and traded. We need not repeat this old story. The point we are making here is that not only are the collaterals junks but they are supporting a mountain of debts in the trillions. Therefore, when collaterals are impaired the TBTF banks are in a hole from which they cannot get out. The FED and other central banks have no choice but to bail out the TBTF banks if a systemic failure is to be avoided. If all the junk collaterals were to be off-loaded at once in the full glare of public scrutiny, there would be a run on all the banks. So, what was required was a stealth rescue effort. The TBTF banks were allowed to unload the junk collaterals bit by bit by the various schemes of the FED culminating in the US$85 billion a month purchases of treasury bonds and mortgages by the FED.
Additionally, newly “minted” collaterals were used to replace the junks so as to clean up the balance sheets of the TBTF banks. I have stated earlier that the minimum amount of toxic assets needed to be mopped up is US$20 trillion. After five years, the FED has just scratched the surface. It is debatable how many US$ Trillions the FED has actually pumped into the system directly and indirectly. How much and how long more can the FED continue to pump US$ toilet paper into the system without creating a massive loss of confidence in the dollar? When the balance sheet of the FED reaches US$7 Trillion or maybe US$10 Trillion? It is anybody’s guess.
For sure, there will be a point when another US$100 Billion is created on top of the stash of US$ toilet papers which will tip the scale and collapse the entire system. It is a catch-22 for the FED. If it stops creating fiat money out of thin air, the fiat money system would collapse immediately. If it continues with more money creation, it merely postpones the inevitable and more devastating end-game. This is the price we all have to pay for allowing the fiat money system to hold sway for so long.
The world was conned into accepting the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of banking and finance – the US$ Global Reserve Currency Ponzi Scheme.
This scheme was created on a sand castle of debt, specifically US Treasury Bonds. The world does not need a Global Reserve Currency. Global trade can be conducted in any currency in accordance to the needs and resources of a country.
Why should there be a special privilege given to only one country to have its currency as the sole reserve currency for purposes of trade? It makes no sense as it is the result of US imperialist policies under the pretext of the Cold War. The con was based on the propaganda that the US$ should be the preferred currency and the US Treasury Bond is the “safest asset” to have in the event of an outbreak of war between the Western Imperialist camp and the Soviet bloc. We were told this arrangement was necessary if we are to enjoy the protection of the mighty US superpower!
Yet, when the Soviet bloc collapsed no one questioned the need to perpetuate the system.
Another spin was propagated. The US was the linchpin in the new era of globalisation as the US market was the biggest consumer / export market. Everyone was caught in this web of deceit. The US market was a market built on a mountain of debt. Adding insult to injury, the US consumers paid for the goods produced by millions breaking their backs with US$ toilet paper money!
Some so-called currency experts have asserted that no other currency can replace the US$ toilet paper as the global reserve currency because no other country has a bond market like the US bond market, dominated by the US treasury bonds.  What an idiotic statement!
If a country is not in debt, there is no need for any bonds to be issued. A bond is an I.O.U. A bond is a mere paper pledge to repay a debt.
And anyone who says and continues to perpetuate the myth that a US debt is a better debt and is more secure is ignorant and misinformed!
Why would anyone want to work and produce goods which are sold and paid in US$ toilet paper and then use the surplus US$ toilet paper to lend to the US government who repays the debt by merely printing more US$ toilet paper?
So, do you still think the world needs a US$ toilet paper money as a reserve currency?

This article was aggregated under the Creative Commons License. If you feel this article has been re-published outside of these parameters, please contact us immediately at to resolve any issues. We respect copyrights and address any concerns promptly. Thank you.

Admitted Chemtrail Sprayer Evergreen Air To Close Doors

According to the Yamhill News Register of  Oregon, Evergreen International Airlines’, a chemtrail sprayer by its own admission on the official website of its subsidiary company Evergreen Aviation,  has told employees it will end operations within three weeks. The report states;

“Evergreen International Airlines, key remaining component of Evergreen International Aviation, following the sell-off of its helicopter division, has announced to employees by voice mail that it will be closing its doors effective Friday, Nov. 29, 2013 according to current and former employees. Calls seeking confirmation from the company were not returned.”
From the Evergreen Aviation Website :

"The Evergreen Supertanker is not just limited to fighting fire . It will be a true utilitarian aircraft with the capability to configure to different applications on short notice. This multimission aircraft can support sensitive security and environmental missions. The aircraft's exceptional drop capabilities, loiter time and size make it an ideal tool to perform challenging homeland security missions, able to neutralize chemical attacks on military installments or major population centers, and help control large, environmentally disastrous oil spills.

In addition, the upper deck of the Boeing 747 provides over 200 square feet of space that could be assigned as a command and control center. EIA possesses an FAA exemption number 1870C that permits the carriage of up to five individuals that are not
crew members in the upper deck. This area is capable of providing space for command and control components that would assist in sophisticated mapping, incident monitoring and video/communications downlink relay that might require additional personnel over and above the required crew." 


What Mars May Have Looked Like 4 Billion Years Ago

CGI of how Mars may have appeared billions of years ago.

Click image to zoom

Family Of Woman Killed In D.C. Calls For Obama Paternity Test


Pastor James David Manning claims the woman gunned down by authorities in DC, Miriam Carey, was the mama of Obama’s love child. Carey’s family have demanded an investigation into her death. Pastor Manning and Miriam’s sister, Valarie Carey, a retired NYPD police sergeant, are also demanding Obama submit to a paternity test.

In the video below, Rev./Dr. James David Manning refers to a phone interview he had with Miriam’s sister, Valarie Carey, who is a retired New York City police sergeant, and points out many oddities about Miriam’s death:

  • Why did Capitol Hill police, who are trained to be temperate, instead shot to kill an unarmed woman who had a baby in the back seat of her car? No guns or bombs or threatening letters were found in her car. (To that I’ll add this: If police thought Miriam’s careening car was a public hazard, why didn’t they shoot out the car’s tires?)
  • Why did police not follow the usual procedure of notifying the next of kin first? Instead, according to Valerie Carey, police released Miriam’s identification to the public before notifying her family. Valerie found out about her sister from a reporter’s phone call.
  • When the Carey family traveled to Washington, DC, they were told they couldn’t see Miriam’s body but were just shown a photo of her body.
  • To this day, the Carey family has not been given an official notification of Miriam’s death, or of the autopsy report, or how many times she was shot.
  • Why are black race-agitators like Al Sharpton and Charles Rangel silent about Miriam’s shooting death when they normally raise a hue-and-cry about any alleged police mistreatment of blacks? Sharpton’s silence is especially noteworthy because Miriam’s sister, Valerie Carey, is on the executive board of his National Action Network. Did somebody get to Sharpton?
  • Why did the police intimidate and silence Carey family attorney Eric Sanders?
  • Why is Miriam being discredited and portrayed as a mentally-ill, deranged woman when there is no evidence as such? On the contrary, Miriam was highly functional, being a dental hygienist. The only medication she was taking was prescription med for post-partum depression.
  • And the biggest question of all: Why did Miriam Carey drive to Washington, DC that day, and specifically to the White House?
That last question is what prompted Valarie Carey to wonder if her sister’s 18-month-old daughter is Barack Obama’s “love child.”
To answer that question, Valarie Carey and Rev. Manning are demanding a paternity test of Miriam’s daughter, and that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder conduct an investigation into the death of Miriam Carey.

Click image to zoom

The Battle for World Domination ~ Part One ~ Paper Tigers ~ by Greg Giles

To understand the many different groups who are each vying for global dominance, or at least battling to maintain a part of the control of this world, we first must eliminate a few of the names that many at this time erroneously believe are powerful figures on the global stage. 

Let us first start with someone who many across the globe believe is not only a powerful figure in the world of politics, but is the single most powerful person in the entire world; this being the president of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama. Many believe that because the United States is the most powerful country in the world, that by default the presumed leader of the United States would be the leader of the free world. This is hardly the case.

The president of the United States is not a powerful figure at all. The president of the United States is as many of you would understand him to be a puppet, his strings pulled by forces that do possess a certain amount of power and influence over the United States and thus the rest of the world. I do not see Obama as a puppet however, but this is not because I believe he thinks and acts on his own accord, because I certainly do not. I believe puppet would be far too generous for him, and I am not trying to be insulting or amusing, not at all. What I mean is, when one refers to a political figure as a puppet, one would imagine that figure to be a politician who perhaps is influenced by other individuals or groups, perhaps even against his will. I do not see Obama as a politician at all. I see Obama as an actor, a mere  figurehead, a paid spokesperson. I believe that many members of Congress and others who presume to be politicians are also merely figureheads, hired to play the part because they have clean criminal histories, a suitable profile, an ability to read a teleprompter and a family, whether this family is also comprised of actors or not. There are shadow governments behind most ‘politicians’,  and it is important to understand there is more than one group calling the shots from behind the scenes, and often these shots are not aligned. 

Which brings us to Barack Obama. Obama did not wake up one morning and think “I have this great idea to totally re-create the healthcare system of the United States and I will call it Obamacare, and even though a majority of the country will call for my head, I am going to push Obamacare anyway because I care so much about my fellow man and their health. Folks, that is not how it happened. How it happened was this; Obama received a phone call one day advising him that he would be supporting something called Obamacare. The particulars would be none of his concern. 

It's important to understand that it's not Obama’s philosophies that are behind all of these draconian decisions that act to chisel away the rights of the citizenry. It is those that have gotten him elected that call the shots. We will discuss who they are and what their agenda is later on in our series, but let us continue today with another figure that many believe responsible for so many of the worlds ills. 

When discussing secret governments and hidden agendas one name is still proliferated far more than any other and that is Rockefeller. Let us first make clear who Rockefeller is. The Rockefeller that most refer to when discussing conspiracies is David Rockefeller. David Rockefeller is not a politician, but does own an incredible amount of businesses throughout the United States and the rest of the world. He comes from a long line of Rockefeller's, and in the past the Rockefeller clan did wield a sizable amount of political influence in this world, but those days appear to be over. David Rockefeller today is a elderly man who does continue to bark orders into a phone, yes this is true, but no one's really listening anymore. Even though there are many who still accept payouts from him, he no longer wields much influence in the world and even in his home country of the United States. Today the Rockefeller family can't even identify all of the businesses they rightfully own as the family has amassed such an empire. The profits from some of these business interests may even be going to others outside of the Rockefeller family. Don't feel bad for the Rockefeller family however, as they have more money than 1000 families could spend in 1 million lifetimes. 

Jay Rockefeller is a politician and brother of David. He is currently the governor of West Virginia. The Rockefeller family is not from West Virginia of course, and you may ask yourself why in the world is Jay Rockefeller the governor of West Virginia. Jay Rockefeller became the governor of West Virginia to keep an eye on his holdings in the coal industry, and if you want to keep an eye on the coal industry you should probably stay pretty close to West Virginia. 

Jay Rockefeller appears not to be running for a sixth term as governor of West Virginia, even making enemies out of those in the coal industry who were his allies for so many years. He has recently shocked the entire coal industry by siding with the Obama administration in a disagreement concerning the environmental impact of coal mining. This dispute is directly related to the hidden struggle  for power between competing world factions, though the Rockefeller family is generally no longer considered one of these.  

Greg Giles